Food Aid in Africa. Thoughts from the Field
This might be of interest to some of you in my various networks. Rachel Laudan is an historian of science, technology and food. When I'm not posting on my own blog I can be found occasionally posting comments on her posts about the politics of food. One of these days I'll start writing my own critiques here.
Diana Buja works in Burundi on a goat and agriculture rehabilitation project. She also sent me photos of a school in Burundi that wants to participate in my Seed Bank online exchange program (Green Education Exchange). Her criticisms about food aid in Africa and the "political underbelly" at the local, national and global levels are spot on.
A Historian’s Take on Food and Food Politics
Food Aid in Africa. Thoughts from the Field
Published January 5, 2009 by Rachel Laudan
Diana Buja, known to many of you on this list, offered this long comment on foreign aid in response to one of my posts on Michael Pollan’s Farmer-in-Chief. Because it is the result of years of work and reflection on food in Africa, I am posting it in full. Public Law 480, just as a reminder, has been the guiding US government framework for food aid since it was passed in 1954.
“Yes, food/farming = war/foreign policy = food/farming…
I have been on the ‘receiving’ end of PL480 (Public Law 480) for a number of years. I.e., projects that I have been / am involved with that *must* use left-over crops from the US in order to qualify for very much needed food aid assistance for seriously starving folk. Often times the products are not what local folk can eat (hey, but can beggars be choosers?! - goes the bureaucratic response…).
Over decades, without local compliance, ‘we’ have been gradually changing local food preferences from indigenous and highly (disease/drought) resistant food crops - such as colocasia, millet and sorghum - to highly refined and fragile crops - primarily maize & milk powder & corn oil - the staples of PL480 and, in the case of the European Union, powdered milk food-dumping.